__timestamp | CRISPR Therapeutics AG | Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1513000 | 3788000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 12573000 | 4006000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 42238000 | 4261000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 69800000 | 4371000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 113773000 | 4853000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 179362000 | 4675000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 269407000 | 4572000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 17953000 | 6601000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 110250000 | 5657000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 130250000 | 6498000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | -2314000 | 28675800000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving world of biotechnology, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. This chart compares the cost of revenue for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG from 2014 to 2023. Gilead Sciences, a stalwart in the industry, consistently reported higher costs, peaking at approximately $6.6 billion in 2021. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics, a pioneer in gene editing, showed a more dynamic trend, with costs rising from a modest $1.5 million in 2014 to over $130 million in 2023.
Despite the disparity in absolute numbers, the growth rate of CRISPR's cost of revenue is noteworthy, increasing by over 8,500% over the decade. This reflects the company's rapid expansion and investment in cutting-edge technologies. Meanwhile, Gilead's costs grew by about 72%, indicating a more stable, mature business model. This comparison highlights the contrasting strategies of these biotech leaders in navigating the competitive landscape.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Novartis AG and CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Amgen Inc. vs Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Alkermes plc
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Viatris Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Cost of Revenue Trends: Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG
CRISPR Therapeutics AG vs PTC Therapeutics, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: CRISPR Therapeutics AG and Geron Corporation