Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotech Giants' Cost of Revenue: A Decade in Review

__timestampCRISPR Therapeutics AGNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014151300014400000
Thursday, January 1, 20151257300033800000
Friday, January 1, 20164223800035900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017698000001254000
Monday, January 1, 20181137730004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191793620007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202026940700010100000
Friday, January 1, 20211795300014300000
Saturday, January 1, 202211025000023200000
Sunday, January 1, 202313025000039700000
Monday, January 1, 2024-231400034000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for two prominent players: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Evolution

CRISPR Therapeutics AG has seen a staggering increase in its cost of revenue, growing by over 8,500% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects its aggressive expansion and investment in cutting-edge gene-editing technologies. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. has maintained a more stable cost structure, with a modest increase of around 175% over the same period.

Strategic Implications

The data suggests CRISPR Therapeutics is heavily investing in R&D and scaling operations, while Neurocrine focuses on optimizing existing processes. Investors should consider these strategies when evaluating potential returns and risks in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025