__timestamp | HUTCHMED (China) Limited | Novo Nordisk A/S |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 72049000 | 14562000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 110777000 | 16188000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 156328000 | 17183000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 175820000 | 17632000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 143944000 | 17617000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 160152000 | 20088000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 188519000 | 20932000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 258234000 | 23658000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 311103000 | 28448000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 384447000 | 35765000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 44522000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost efficiency is paramount. This chart provides a fascinating comparison between Novo Nordisk A/S and HUTCHMED (China) Limited over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023.
Novo Nordisk, a global leader in diabetes care, showcases a robust cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $35.8 billion in 2023. This represents a steady increase of over 145% from 2014. In contrast, HUTCHMED, a rising star in innovative oncology therapies, demonstrates a more modest growth, with its cost of revenue reaching around $384 million in 2023, marking a significant 434% increase from 2014.
This stark contrast highlights Novo Nordisk's expansive scale and market reach, while HUTCHMED's rapid growth underscores its potential in the competitive pharmaceutical sector. As these companies continue to evolve, their cost efficiency will remain a critical factor in their success.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Novo Nordisk A/S and GSK plc
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Novo Nordisk A/S and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Novo Nordisk A/S vs Lantheus Holdings, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Novo Nordisk A/S vs Alkermes plc: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Novo Nordisk A/S vs Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Revenue Showdown: Novo Nordisk A/S vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Novo Nordisk A/S vs ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Novo Nordisk A/S vs Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Pfizer Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Cost of Revenue Trends: Pharming Group N.V. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Travere Therapeutics, Inc.