Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Oracle Corporation vs ASML Holding N.V.

Oracle vs. ASML: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Oracle Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201433589070007236000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533917000007532000000
Friday, January 1, 201637503000007479000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749761000007452000000
Monday, January 1, 201862257000008060000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201969199000007995000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000007938000000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000007855000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000008877000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231342240000013564000000
Monday, January 1, 20241377090000015143000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of Cost Efficiency: Oracle vs. ASML

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, cost efficiency is a critical metric for success. Over the past decade, Oracle Corporation and ASML Holding N.V. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2023, Oracle's cost of revenue increased by approximately 87%, peaking at $13.56 billion in 2023. Meanwhile, ASML's cost of revenue surged by nearly 300%, reaching $13.42 billion in the same year. This remarkable growth reflects ASML's expanding role in the semiconductor industry, driven by the global demand for advanced lithography machines.

Interestingly, Oracle maintained a relatively stable cost structure until 2020, after which it saw a significant rise. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring. These insights underscore the importance of strategic cost management in maintaining competitive advantage in the tech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025