Cost of Revenue Comparison: Oracle Corporation vs International Business Machines Corporation

Oracle vs. IBM: A Decade of Cost of Revenue Shifts

__timestampInternational Business Machines CorporationOracle Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014463860000007236000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015410570000007532000000
Friday, January 1, 2016414030000007479000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017421960000007452000000
Monday, January 1, 2018426550000008060000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019261810000007995000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020243140000007938000000
Friday, January 1, 2021258650000007855000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022278420000008877000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232756000000013564000000
Monday, January 1, 20242720200000015143000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: Oracle vs. IBM

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology giants, Oracle Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have long been at the forefront. This chart provides a fascinating glimpse into their cost of revenue trends from 2014 to 2024. Over this decade, IBM's cost of revenue has seen a significant decline, dropping by approximately 41% from its peak in 2014. In contrast, Oracle's cost of revenue has shown a steady increase, rising by nearly 110% over the same period.

This divergence highlights the strategic shifts within these companies. IBM's reduction in cost of revenue may reflect its transition towards more efficient operations and a focus on high-margin services. Meanwhile, Oracle's increase could indicate its aggressive expansion and investment in cloud infrastructure. As we move into 2024, Oracle's cost of revenue surpasses IBM's, marking a pivotal moment in their financial trajectories.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025