Comparing Innovation Spending: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Catalyst: A Decade of R&D Investment

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014453400000010117774
Thursday, January 1, 2015592000000011801342
Friday, January 1, 2016494000000011369941
Sunday, January 1, 2017641100000011375237
Monday, January 1, 2018634500000019919204
Tuesday, January 1, 2019614800000018842752
Wednesday, January 1, 20201114300000016496715
Friday, January 1, 20211019500000016936000
Saturday, January 1, 2022950900000019789000
Sunday, January 1, 2023929900000093150000
Monday, January 1, 202411159000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Decade of Innovation: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, research and development (R&D) spending is a key indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has consistently outpaced Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in R&D investment. From 2014 to 2023, Bristol-Myers Squibb's R&D expenses surged by over 100%, peaking in 2020 with a remarkable 11 billion dollars. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, while showing growth, reached its highest R&D spending in 2023, with just over 93 million dollars, a fraction of its larger competitor's budget.

This stark difference highlights the scale and resources of these companies. Bristol-Myers Squibb's substantial investment underscores its strategic focus on pioneering treatments, while Catalyst Pharmaceuticals' more modest budget reflects its niche market approach. As the industry continues to innovate, these spending patterns offer insights into each company's future trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025