Comparing Innovation Spending: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

R&D Spending: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Neurocrine Biosciences

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014453400000046425000
Thursday, January 1, 2015592000000081491000
Friday, January 1, 2016494000000094291000
Sunday, January 1, 20176411000000121827000
Monday, January 1, 20186345000000160524000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196148000000200000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011143000000275000000
Friday, January 1, 202110195000000328100000
Saturday, January 1, 20229509000000463800000
Sunday, January 1, 20239299000000565000000
Monday, January 1, 202411159000000731100000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Innovation in Pharmaceuticals: A Decade of R&D Investment

In the ever-evolving landscape of pharmaceuticals, research and development (R&D) spending is a critical indicator of a company's commitment to innovation. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting yet significant investment strategies in R&D.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, a global biopharmaceutical leader, has consistently increased its R&D expenses, peaking in 2020 with a 150% rise from 2014. This surge underscores their dedication to pioneering treatments and maintaining a competitive edge. Meanwhile, Neurocrine Biosciences, a smaller yet dynamic player, has shown a remarkable 1,100% increase in R&D spending over the same period, reflecting its aggressive pursuit of innovative solutions in neurology and endocrinology.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies within the industry, where both giants and niche companies are investing heavily to drive future breakthroughs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025