Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly vs. Neurocrine Biosciences Over a Decade

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014662080000017986000
Thursday, January 1, 2015653300000032480000
Friday, January 1, 2016645200000068081000
Sunday, January 1, 20176588100000169906000
Monday, January 1, 20185975100000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196213800000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206121200000433300000
Friday, January 1, 20216431600000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 20226440400000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 20236941200000887600000
Monday, January 1, 202485938000001007200000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of SG&A Trends: Eli Lilly vs. Neurocrine Biosciences

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants is crucial. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Company and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

Eli Lilly, a stalwart in the industry, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually. This reflects their robust investment in marketing and administrative functions, crucial for sustaining their market leadership. Notably, their SG&A expenses peaked in 2023, marking a 5% increase from 2014.

Conversely, Neurocrine Biosciences, a dynamic player, has demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory. From a modest $18 million in 2014, their SG&A expenses surged by nearly 4,800% to $888 million in 2023. This exponential rise underscores their aggressive expansion and strategic investments in market penetration.

These trends highlight the contrasting strategies of established and emerging pharmaceutical companies, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025