Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs Merus N.V. Trends and Insights

Eli Lilly vs. Merus N.V.: SG&A Spending Insights

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyMerus N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466208000003852327
Thursday, January 1, 20156533000000839656
Friday, January 1, 201664520000004478145
Sunday, January 1, 2017658810000016432324
Monday, January 1, 2018597510000011890871
Tuesday, January 1, 2019621380000034110000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612120000035781000
Friday, January 1, 2021643160000040896000
Saturday, January 1, 2022644040000052200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023694120000059836000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

A Decade of SG&A Trends: Eli Lilly vs. Merus N.V.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants like Eli Lilly and emerging players such as Merus N.V. is crucial. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly has consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses, averaging around $6.4 billion annually. This investment underscores its commitment to maintaining a robust market presence and operational efficiency.

Conversely, Merus N.V., a smaller biotech firm, has shown a remarkable growth trajectory in its SG&A spending, increasing from a modest $3.9 million in 2014 to nearly $60 million by 2023. This 15-fold increase highlights Merus's aggressive expansion strategy and its efforts to scale operations and market reach.

These contrasting financial strategies offer a fascinating glimpse into how established and emerging companies navigate the competitive pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025