Comparing SG&A Expenses: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Halozyme vs Viking Trends

__timestampHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014359420001244910
Thursday, January 1, 2015400280005029636
Friday, January 1, 2016458530004846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017538160005329003
Monday, January 1, 2018608040007121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019772520009128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204573600010731000
Friday, January 1, 20215032300010701000
Saturday, January 1, 202214352600016121000
Sunday, January 1, 202314918200037021000
Monday, January 1, 2024154335000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing expenses is crucial for success. This chart highlights the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Halozyme's SG&A expenses surged by over 300%, peaking in 2023, while Viking's expenses increased by nearly 2,900%, reflecting its growth trajectory. Notably, Halozyme's expenses consistently outpaced Viking's, indicating a more aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions. The year 2022 marked a significant leap for both companies, with Halozyme's expenses nearly doubling from the previous year, and Viking's expenses more than tripling by 2023. These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the biotech industry, where strategic financial management can be a key differentiator in achieving market leadership.

Key Insights

  • Halozyme's SG&A expenses grew steadily, reflecting strategic investments.
  • Viking's expenses showed rapid growth, indicating expansion efforts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025