Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Grifols, S.A.

SG&A Expenses: Halozyme vs. Grifols Over a Decade

__timestampGrifols, S.A.Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466077200035942000
Thursday, January 1, 201573643500040028000
Friday, January 1, 201677526600045853000
Sunday, January 1, 201786034800053816000
Monday, January 1, 201881477500060804000
Tuesday, January 1, 201994282100077252000
Wednesday, January 1, 202098561600045736000
Friday, January 1, 2021106150800050323000
Saturday, January 1, 20221190423000143526000
Sunday, January 1, 20231254234000149182000
Monday, January 1, 2024154335000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the biopharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and Grifols, S.A. over the past decade. Grifols, a global leader in plasma-derived medicines, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 90% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expansive global operations. In contrast, Halozyme, a smaller biotech firm, experienced a staggering 315% increase in SG&A expenses during the same period, indicative of its aggressive growth strategy. By 2023, Grifols' SG&A expenses were nearly 8.5 times higher than Halozyme's, underscoring the scale difference between the two. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ to manage operational costs while striving for market leadership.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025