Comparing SG&A Expenses: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Cytokinetics, Incorporated Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Intra-Cellular vs. Cytokinetics

__timestampCytokinetics, IncorporatedIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141726800010337679
Thursday, January 1, 20151966700018187286
Friday, January 1, 20162782300024758063
Sunday, January 1, 20173646800023666957
Monday, January 1, 20183128200030099855
Tuesday, January 1, 20193961000064947625
Wednesday, January 1, 202052820000186363444
Friday, January 1, 202196803000272611040
Saturday, January 1, 2022177977000358782000
Sunday, January 1, 2023173612000409864000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Innovators

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent biotech companies: Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. and Cytokinetics, Incorporated, from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Over the past decade, Intra-Cellular Therapies has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 40 times from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in marketing and administrative capabilities. In contrast, Cytokinetics has experienced a more moderate growth, with expenses increasing by approximately 10 times over the same period.

Strategic Implications

The divergent trends in SG&A expenses highlight differing strategic priorities. Intra-Cellular's rapid increase suggests a focus on scaling operations, while Cytokinetics' steadier growth may indicate a more conservative approach. Investors should consider these trends when evaluating potential growth and risk in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025