Comparing SG&A Expenses: Pharming Group N.V. vs Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Catalyst vs. Pharming - A Decade of Change

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Pharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201444736544042025
Thursday, January 1, 201585970105279557
Friday, January 1, 201679102608073913
Sunday, January 1, 2017730439944864073
Monday, January 1, 20181587596153488904
Tuesday, January 1, 20193688118765896361
Wednesday, January 1, 20204423375469968267
Friday, January 1, 20214962800092047281
Saturday, January 1, 202258183000131819000
Sunday, January 1, 202313371000087501000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial dynamics of companies is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: Pharming Group N.V. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has shown a remarkable increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 2,900% over the decade. This surge, peaking in 2023, reflects their aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. In contrast, Pharming Group N.V. experienced a more moderate increase of around 2,100%, with a significant spike in 2022.

Strategic Implications

These trends highlight differing strategic priorities. Catalyst's rapid expense growth suggests a focus on market penetration, while Pharming's steadier increase may indicate a balanced approach to growth and cost management. Investors and stakeholders should consider these financial trajectories when evaluating future prospects.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025