Comparing SG&A Expenses: Blueprint Medicines Corporation vs Pharming Group N.V. Trends and Insights

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade of Growth

__timestampBlueprint Medicines CorporationPharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 201478900004042025
Thursday, January 1, 2015144560005279557
Friday, January 1, 2016192180008073913
Sunday, January 1, 20172798600044864073
Monday, January 1, 20184792800053488904
Tuesday, January 1, 20199638800065896361
Wednesday, January 1, 202015774300069968267
Friday, January 1, 202119529300092047281
Saturday, January 1, 2022237374000131819000
Sunday, January 1, 202329514100087501000
Monday, January 1, 2024359272000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of companies is crucial. Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Pharming Group N.V. offer a fascinating study in contrasts when it comes to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade.

Blueprint Medicines Corporation

Since 2014, Blueprint Medicines has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 3,600% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities, peaking at nearly $295 million in 2023.

Pharming Group N.V.

In contrast, Pharming Group N.V. has maintained a more conservative growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 2,100% over the same period. Their expenses reached a high of $132 million in 2022, before slightly decreasing in 2023.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025