Comparing SG&A Expenses: Pharming Group N.V. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Dynavax vs. Pharming Trends

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationPharming Group N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014177630004042025
Thursday, January 1, 2015221800005279557
Friday, January 1, 2016372570008073913
Sunday, January 1, 20172736700044864073
Monday, January 1, 20186477000053488904
Tuesday, January 1, 20197498600065896361
Wednesday, January 1, 20207925600069968267
Friday, January 1, 202110015600092047281
Saturday, January 1, 2022131408000131819000
Sunday, January 1, 202315294600087501000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: Pharming Group N.V. and Dynavax Technologies Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Over the past decade, Dynavax Technologies has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 760% from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects the company's aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. In contrast, Pharming Group N.V. experienced a more moderate increase of around 2,070% during the same period, peaking in 2022.

Comparative Analysis

By 2023, Dynavax's SG&A expenses were about 75% higher than Pharming's, indicating a more substantial investment in administrative and sales efforts. This trend highlights the differing strategic priorities of these companies, with Dynavax focusing more on scaling operations.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025