| __timestamp | Dynavax Technologies Corporation | Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 17763000 | 15746000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 22180000 | 13392000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 37257000 | 9290000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 27367000 | 7672000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 64770000 | 15293000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 74986000 | 22648000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 79256000 | 21864000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 100156000 | 37318000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 131408000 | 48130000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 152946000 | 108146000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Dynavax's SG&A expenses surged by over 760%, peaking in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and strategic investments. In contrast, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, while also increasing their SG&A spending, exhibited a more moderate growth of approximately 590% over the same period. Notably, Madrigal's expenses saw a significant jump in 2023, reaching nearly 71% of Dynavax's peak spending. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities: Dynavax's focus on rapid scaling versus Madrigal's steady growth approach. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A patterns offer valuable insights into their operational strategies and market positioning.
Novartis AG and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: argenx SE vs Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Insmed Incorporated vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Opthea Limited Trends and Insights
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Verona Pharma plc
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Bausch Health Companies Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
MannKind Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Novavax, Inc.