Comparing SG&A Expenses: United Therapeutics Corporation vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Trends and Insights

Biotech SG&A Expenses: United Therapeutics vs. BioCryst

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.United Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20147461000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 201513047000452612000
Friday, January 1, 201611253000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000330100000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000423900000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000477100000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotech Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, United Therapeutics Corporation and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses. From 2014 to 2023, United Therapeutics consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $487 million in 2022. This reflects their expansive operational strategies and robust market presence. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, while starting with a modest $7 million in 2014, saw a dramatic increase, reaching $214 million by 2023. This 28-fold rise highlights their aggressive growth and investment in administrative capabilities. The data underscores the strategic differences between these two companies, offering insights into their operational priorities and market strategies. As the biotech industry evolves, understanding these financial dynamics becomes essential for investors and stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025