Comparison of Cost of Revenue for Selected Companies Over Years

Historical Cost of Revenue Trends in Pharma

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc., GILDJohnson & Johnson, JNJMerck & Co., Inc., MRKNovo Nordisk A/S, NVOPfizer Inc., PFE
Tuesday, January 1, 19852343700000108990000020733732001416200000
Wednesday, January 1, 19862354900000114410000032938455001573300000
Thursday, January 1, 19872602000000123430000025897932001734900000
Friday, January 1, 19882901000000132120000027166048001825600000
Sunday, January 1, 19893066000000132860000037649535001855200000
Monday, January 1, 1990-8000003463000000152410000041252192002034600000
Tuesday, January 1, 1991-10000003711000000167110000047952571501956500000
Wednesday, January 1, 1992-17000004118000000177470000025265630001760400000
Friday, January 1, 19934174000000211110000064076850001513800000
Saturday, January 1, 1994-28000004575000000528110000038333993601626600000
Sunday, January 1, 1995-32000005378000000678910000038295220001790100000
Monday, January 1, 1996-36000006009000000858830000041673842761746000000
Wednesday, January 1, 1997-180000060850000001095320000047217049921772000000
Thursday, January 1, 1998-220000061900000001317460000043869809761605000000
Friday, January 1, 19991690000069980000001670680000050494258301986000000
Saturday, January 1, 20002150400073460000002116620000043795752004059000000
Monday, January 1, 20014376400095360000002897650000059647631405034000000
Tuesday, January 1, 200269724000104470000003305360000066247178404045000000
Wednesday, January 1, 200311269100012176000000431530000074618274009832000000
Thursday, January 1, 200416658700013422000000495980000081054953707541000000
Saturday, January 1, 200526032600013954000000514960000091659869208525000000
Sunday, January 1, 200643332000015057000000600110000095890682007640000000
Monday, January 1, 2007768771000177510000006140700000980353800011239000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20081127246000185110000005582500000101313848008112000000
Thursday, January 1, 20091595558000184470000009018900000104380000008888000000
Friday, January 1, 2010186987600018792000000183960000001168000000016279000000
Saturday, January 1, 2011212441000020360000000168710000001258900000015085000000
Sunday, January 1, 2012247136300021658000000164460000001346500000011334000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201328585020002234200000016954000000141400000009586000000
Wednesday, January 1, 201437880000002274600000016768000000145620000009577000000
Thursday, January 1, 201540060000002153600000014934000000161880000009648000000
Friday, January 1, 2016426100000021685000000138910000001718300000012329000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017437100000025354000000127750000001763200000011240000000
Monday, January 1, 2018485300000027091000000135090000001761700000011248000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019467500000027556000000141120000002008800000010219000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202045720000002842700000013618000000209320000008692000000
Friday, January 1, 2021660100000023402000000136260000002365800000030821000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022565700000024596000000174110000002844800000034344000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023596800000026553000000161260000003576500000029213000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Historical Perspective on Cost of Revenue for Leading Pharmaceutical Companies

Analyzing Trends from 1985 to Present

The pharmaceutical industry has seen significant shifts in cost structures over the past few decades. This analysis focuses on the cost of revenue for five major players: Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences. From 1985 to the present, these companies have navigated through various economic climates, regulatory changes, and market demands.

Key Insights

  • Johnson & Johnson consistently led the pack, with its cost of revenue peaking at approximately $28.4 billion. This reflects the company's extensive product portfolio and global reach.
  • Merck & Co. and Novo Nordisk followed closely, with costs reaching around $33.1 billion and $35.8 billion, respectively. These figures highlight their significant investments in research and development.
  • Pfizer showed a steady increase, with costs peaking at $34.3 billion, underscoring its aggressive expansion and acquisition strategies.
  • Gilead Sciences had a more volatile trend, with some years showing negative costs, likely due to accounting adjustments or extraordinary items.

Missing Data

It's important to note that some data points are missing, particularly for Gilead Sciences in the earlier years. This could be due to the company's later entry into the market or incomplete historical records.

Conclusion

Understanding the cost of revenue trends for these pharmaceutical giants provides valuable insights into their operational efficiencies and strategic priorities. As the industry continues to evolve, monitoring these trends will be crucial for investors, analysts, and industry stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
15 Sept 2024