__timestamp | Cummins Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2498000000 | 767600000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2604000000 | 848900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2534000000 | 942400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3035000000 | 971900000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3486000000 | 1057400000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3623000000 | 1067000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3125000000 | 991400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2862000000 | 1249100000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3802000000 | 1351500000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3025000000 | 1478800000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 6338000000 | 1520700000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial giants, Cummins Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated have showcased remarkable financial resilience over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Cummins Inc. consistently outperformed Snap-on in terms of EBITDA, with an average of approximately $3.06 billion annually, nearly three times Snap-on's average of $1.07 billion.
This comparative analysis highlights the strategic prowess and adaptability of these industrial leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and industry enthusiasts alike.
Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
Gross Profit Comparison: Cummins Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated Trends
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Cummins Inc. Against TransUnion
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Cummins Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated
Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Cummins Inc. Compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Cummins Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated