__timestamp | Cummins Inc. | Masco Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2498000000 | 899000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2604000000 | 1041000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2534000000 | 1220000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 3035000000 | 1314000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 3486000000 | 1240000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3623000000 | 1244000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3125000000 | 1410000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2862000000 | 1185000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3802000000 | 1490000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 3025000000 | 1493000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 6338000000 | 1410000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial and home improvement sectors, Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation have demonstrated remarkable resilience and growth over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Cummins Inc. has seen its EBITDA grow by approximately 21%, peaking in 2022 with a notable 3.8 billion. This growth trajectory underscores Cummins' strategic initiatives and robust operational efficiencies.
Conversely, Masco Corporation, a leader in home improvement products, has experienced a steady EBITDA increase of around 66% over the same period. By 2023, Masco's EBITDA reached nearly 1.5 billion, reflecting its successful adaptation to market demands and consumer preferences.
This comparative analysis not only highlights the financial health of these industry giants but also offers insights into their strategic directions. As we look to the future, both companies are well-positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities in their respective markets.
Revenue Showdown: Cummins Inc. vs Masco Corporation
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation
Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Cummins Inc. and Masco Corporation
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Cummins Inc. Against TransUnion
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Cummins Inc. vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cummins Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Cummins Inc. Compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Cummins Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated