| __timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Hubbell Incorporated |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 531144000 | 594700000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 520410000 | 533600000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 506120000 | 564700000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 561524000 | 585600000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 577061000 | 677500000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 663731000 | 740900000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 745424000 | 671400000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 834449000 | 661000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 826865000 | 854300000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 958150000 | 1169700000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1199992000 | 1291200000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, EBITDA serves as a crucial metric for evaluating a company's operational performance. Over the past decade, Hubbell Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation have showcased intriguing trends in their EBITDA figures. From 2014 to 2023, Booz Allen Hamilton's EBITDA grew by approximately 127%, peaking in 2023. Meanwhile, Hubbell Incorporated experienced a 97% increase, reaching its zenith in the same year.
Interestingly, 2022 marked a pivotal year where Hubbell's EBITDA surpassed Booz Allen Hamilton's by about 3%, highlighting a shift in operational efficiency. However, 2024 data for Hubbell remains elusive, leaving room for speculation. This comparison not only underscores the dynamic nature of these corporations but also offers a window into their strategic maneuvers in a competitive market. As we look to the future, these trends provide valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Hubbell Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Hubbell Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Expenses
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Hubbell Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Hubbell Incorporated Compared to Snap-on Incorporated
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Hubbell Incorporated or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
EBITDA Performance Review: Hubbell Incorporated vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Hubbell Incorporated vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Hubbell Incorporated Compared to Masco Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Hubbell Incorporated vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Hubbell Incorporated Compared to Pentair plc
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Hubbell Incorporated vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Hubbell Incorporated vs RB Global, Inc.