| __timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Hubbell Incorporated |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2229642000 | 591600000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2159439000 | 617200000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2319592000 | 622900000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2568511000 | 648200000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2719909000 | 743500000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2932602000 | 756100000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3334378000 | 676300000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3362722000 | 619200000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3633150000 | 762500000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4341769000 | 848600000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1281443000 | 812500000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated from 2014 to 2023. Booz Allen Hamilton, a leader in management consulting, has seen its SG&A expenses rise by approximately 95% over the decade, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Hubbell Incorporated, a key player in electrical products, maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with a modest increase of around 43% over the same period.
While Booz Allen's expenses surged, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy, Hubbell's steadier approach suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Notably, data for Hubbell in 2024 is missing, indicating potential reporting delays. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies companies employ in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Hubbell Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Hubbell Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Expenses
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Hubbell Incorporated vs Snap-on Incorporated Trends and Insights
Hubbell Incorporated vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Hubbell Incorporated vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated Trends and Insights
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Hubbell Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Hubbell Incorporated and Masco Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Hubbell Incorporated vs J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Hubbell Incorporated and Pentair plc
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Hubbell Incorporated vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Hubbell Incorporated vs RB Global, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Hubbell Incorporated vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation