__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Pure Storage, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 27078000000 | 24129000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 33038000000 | 77552000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 32780000000 | 167893000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 34261000000 | 252279000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 38353000000 | 353781000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 42910000000 | 457528000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 46078000000 | 509886000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 52232000000 | 535255000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 62650000000 | 708329000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 65863000000 | 855788000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 74114000000 | 809430000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft Corporation's cost of revenue surged by approximately 174%, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. In contrast, Pure Storage, Inc. experienced a staggering increase of over 3,250% in the same period, highlighting its rapid market penetration and scaling efforts.
Microsoft's cost of revenue consistently grew, peaking in 2024, showcasing its commitment to innovation and market leadership. Meanwhile, Pure Storage's costs, though significantly smaller, reveal a dynamic growth trajectory, indicative of a burgeoning player in the storage solutions sector.
This decade-long analysis underscores the contrasting growth strategies of a tech giant and an emerging contender. As Microsoft consolidates its dominance, Pure Storage's aggressive expansion strategy positions it as a formidable competitor in the tech industry.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Microsoft Corporation vs ON Semiconductor Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs PTC Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Microsoft Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Microsoft Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared