Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Microsoft vs. Pure Storage: SG&A Spending Insights

__timestampMicrosoft CorporationPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142048800000060652000
Thursday, January 1, 201520324000000184674000
Friday, January 1, 201619198000000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 201719942000000444687000
Monday, January 1, 201822223000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 201923098000000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 202024709000000891175000
Friday, January 1, 202125224000000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 202227725000000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 2023303340000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 2024320650000001197264000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Spending Trends

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding how companies allocate their resources is crucial. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated distinct strategies in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance. In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow nearly 20 times, indicative of its aggressive market penetration strategy.

Microsoft's consistent increase in SG&A spending underscores its commitment to maintaining its competitive edge, while Pure Storage's rapid rise highlights its focus on scaling operations. This comparison not only sheds light on their financial strategies but also offers insights into their future trajectories in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025