__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Pure Storage, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 60652000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 184674000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 315976000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 444687000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 575200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 721617000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 891175000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 898491000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 988982000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 1121605000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 1197264000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, understanding how companies allocate their resources is crucial. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc. have demonstrated distinct strategies in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance. In contrast, Pure Storage, a relatively newer player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow nearly 20 times, indicative of its aggressive market penetration strategy.
Microsoft's consistent increase in SG&A spending underscores its commitment to maintaining its competitive edge, while Pure Storage's rapid rise highlights its focus on scaling operations. This comparison not only sheds light on their financial strategies but also offers insights into their future trajectories in the tech industry.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.'s Expenses
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Microsoft Corporation or Pure Storage, Inc.
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Microsoft Corporation vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?