Cost of Revenue Comparison: AstraZeneca PLC vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

AstraZeneca vs BioCryst: A Decade of Cost Analysis

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20145842000000122000
Thursday, January 1, 201546460000001896000
Friday, January 1, 201641260000002699000
Sunday, January 1, 201743180000001702000
Monday, January 1, 20184936000000471000
Tuesday, January 1, 201949210000004101000
Wednesday, January 1, 202052990000001676000
Friday, January 1, 2021124370000007264000
Saturday, January 1, 2022123910000006594000
Sunday, January 1, 202380400000004661000
Monday, January 1, 202410207000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: AstraZeneca vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost structures is crucial. This chart offers a decade-long comparison of the cost of revenue for AstraZeneca PLC and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023. AstraZeneca, a global leader, consistently shows a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2021 with a staggering 12.4 billion USD, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, had a peak cost of revenue of just 7.3 million USD in the same year, highlighting its niche focus. Over the years, AstraZeneca's cost of revenue has grown by approximately 38%, while BioCryst's has seen a more volatile trajectory. This data underscores the scale and operational differences between a pharmaceutical giant and a specialized biotech firm, offering insights into their financial strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025