Cost of Revenue Comparison: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs Evotec SE

Pharma Giants vs. Biotech: Cost Dynamics Unveiled

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyEvotec SE
Wednesday, January 1, 2014393200000060118000
Thursday, January 1, 2015390900000089690000
Friday, January 1, 20164946000000105953000
Sunday, January 1, 20176066000000175062000
Monday, January 1, 20186547000000263389000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198078000000313546000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011773000000375181000
Friday, January 1, 20219940000000466491000
Saturday, January 1, 202210137000000577383000
Sunday, January 1, 202310693000000606375000
Monday, January 1, 20240
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Evotec SE (EVO) offer a fascinating comparison. From 2014 to 2023, BMY's cost of revenue surged by approximately 172%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, Evotec SE, a smaller player, saw a 910% increase, albeit from a much lower base, highlighting its rapid scaling efforts.

A Decade of Change

BMY's cost of revenue peaked in 2020, reaching nearly 11 billion, a testament to its aggressive market positioning. Meanwhile, Evotec's costs, though significantly lower, consistently climbed, indicating strategic investments in innovation. This decade-long data underscores the contrasting paths of a pharmaceutical giant and an agile biotech firm.

Key Insights

While BMY's costs reflect its established market presence, Evotec's growth trajectory showcases the potential of emerging biotech firms in the global arena.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025