Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Cost Efficiency: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. CRISPR Therapeutics

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCRISPR Therapeutics AG
Wednesday, January 1, 201439320000001513000
Thursday, January 1, 2015390900000012573000
Friday, January 1, 2016494600000042238000
Sunday, January 1, 2017606600000069800000
Monday, January 1, 20186547000000113773000
Tuesday, January 1, 20198078000000179362000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011773000000269407000
Friday, January 1, 2021994000000017953000
Saturday, January 1, 202210137000000110250000
Sunday, January 1, 202310693000000130250000
Monday, January 1, 202411949000000-2314000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical industry, has consistently demonstrated robust cost management. From 2014 to 2023, their cost of revenue has grown from approximately $3.9 billion to over $10.6 billion, reflecting a strategic expansion and increased operational efficiency.

In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics AG, a pioneer in gene-editing technology, showcases a different trajectory. Starting with a modest cost of revenue of around $1.5 million in 2014, it peaked at nearly $270 million in 2020, before stabilizing around $130 million in 2023. This reflects the company's rapid growth phase and subsequent stabilization as it matures.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and growth patterns in the biotech and pharmaceutical sectors, offering valuable insights into cost management and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025