Cost of Revenue Comparison: Corning Incorporated vs Pure Storage, Inc.

Corning vs. Pure Storage: A Decade of Revenue Costs

__timestampCorning IncorporatedPure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014566300000024129000
Thursday, January 1, 2015545800000077552000
Friday, January 1, 20165644000000167893000
Sunday, January 1, 20176084000000252279000
Monday, January 1, 20186829000000353781000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197468000000457528000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207772000000509886000
Friday, January 1, 20219019000000535255000
Saturday, January 1, 20229683000000708329000
Sunday, January 1, 20238657000000855788000
Monday, January 1, 20248842000000809430000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and manufacturing, Corning Incorporated and Pure Storage, Inc. present a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Corning's cost of revenue has shown a steady upward trajectory, peaking in 2022 with a 71% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Pure Storage, a relative newcomer, has seen its cost of revenue skyrocket by over 3,400% since 2014, reflecting its rapid growth and expansion in the data storage sector.

A Decade of Change

From 2014 to 2023, Corning's cost of revenue grew consistently, with a notable jump in 2021, reaching nearly 9 billion. In contrast, Pure Storage's cost of revenue, though much smaller in absolute terms, surged from a modest 24 million in 2014 to over 855 million in 2023. This dramatic rise underscores the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where innovation drives both opportunity and cost.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025