Cost of Revenue Comparison: CRISPR Therapeutics AG vs Dyne Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants: Revenue Cost Trends Over a Decade

__timestampCRISPR Therapeutics AGDyne Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201415130001145000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015125730002028000000
Friday, January 1, 2016422380002281000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017698000002932000000
Monday, January 1, 201811377300024000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019179362000271000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020269407000700000
Friday, January 1, 2021179530001088000
Saturday, January 1, 20221102500003345000
Sunday, January 1, 20231302500002461000
Monday, January 1, 2024-2314000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Tale of Two Biotechs: Cost of Revenue Trends

In the dynamic world of biotechnology, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for CRISPR Therapeutics AG and Dyne Therapeutics, Inc. over the past decade. CRISPR Therapeutics, a pioneer in gene-editing technology, has seen its cost of revenue grow steadily, peaking in 2020 with a 1,680% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Dyne Therapeutics, focusing on muscle diseases, experienced a dramatic fluctuation, with a notable spike in 2017, followed by a significant drop in subsequent years.

From 2014 to 2023, CRISPR Therapeutics maintained a consistent upward trend, reflecting its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Dyne Therapeutics' cost of revenue was more volatile, highlighting the challenges and unpredictability in the biotech sector. This comparison underscores the diverse financial landscapes within the industry, offering valuable insights for strategic decision-making.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025