Cost of Revenue Comparison: Fastenal Company vs Lennox International Inc.

Fastenal vs. Lennox: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampFastenal CompanyLennox International Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050002464100000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530002520000000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590002565100000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000002714400000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000002772700000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000002727400000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000002594000000
Friday, January 1, 202132337000003005700000
Saturday, January 1, 202237648000003433700000
Sunday, January 1, 202339922000003434100000
Monday, January 1, 202441441000003569400000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of Cost Dynamics: Fastenal vs. Lennox

In the ever-evolving landscape of industrial supply and climate control solutions, Fastenal Company and Lennox International Inc. have showcased intriguing cost dynamics over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Fastenal's cost of revenue surged by approximately 126%, reflecting its strategic expansion and operational scaling. In contrast, Lennox International experienced a more modest increase of around 45% during the same period, indicating a steady yet controlled growth trajectory.

Fastenal's cost of revenue consistently outpaced Lennox's from 2020 onwards, peaking in 2024 with a 16% higher cost than Lennox. This trend highlights Fastenal's aggressive market positioning and investment in supply chain efficiencies. Meanwhile, Lennox's stable cost management underscores its focus on sustainable growth and innovation in climate control technologies.

These insights offer a window into the strategic priorities and market responses of two industry leaders, providing valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025