Fastenal Company vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Fastenal vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampFastenal CompanyStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530007099800000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 2021323370000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022376480000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023399220000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 2024414410000010851300000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Unveiling Cost Efficiency: Fastenal vs. Stanley Black & Decker

In the competitive landscape of industrial supply, cost efficiency is paramount. Fastenal Company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. have been pivotal players, each showcasing distinct strategies in managing their cost of revenue over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Fastenal's cost of revenue grew by approximately 126%, reflecting a steady increase in operational scale. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker's cost of revenue surged by about 61% during the same period, indicating a more aggressive expansion strategy.

Fastenal's cost efficiency is evident as it maintained a lower cost of revenue compared to Stanley Black & Decker, whose figures were consistently higher, peaking in 2022. Notably, 2024 data for Stanley Black & Decker is missing, leaving room for speculation on their current fiscal strategy. This analysis underscores the importance of cost management in sustaining competitive advantage in the industrial sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025