Cost of Revenue Comparison: GSK plc vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Pharma Giants vs. Biotech: Cost of Revenue Insights

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 20141220007323000000
Thursday, January 1, 201518960008853000000
Friday, January 1, 201626990009290000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017170200010342000000
Monday, January 1, 201847100010241000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019410100011863000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020167600011704000000
Friday, January 1, 2021726400011603000000
Saturday, January 1, 202265940009554000000
Sunday, January 1, 202346610008565000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost structures is crucial. This chart offers a fascinating comparison between GSK plc and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over the past decade. GSK, a global healthcare giant, consistently reported a cost of revenue exceeding $9 billion annually, peaking in 2019. In contrast, BioCryst, a smaller biotech firm, showed a more volatile pattern, with costs ranging from $122,000 in 2014 to a high of $7.3 million in 2021.

Key Insights

GSK's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with a slight decline of around 10% from 2019 to 2023. Meanwhile, BioCryst experienced a dramatic increase of over 5,800% from 2014 to 2021, reflecting its growth and investment in research and development. This comparison highlights the diverse financial landscapes within the pharmaceutical sector, offering insights into strategic priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025