Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Microsoft vs Monolithic Power: Cost of Revenue Insights

__timestampMicrosoft CorporationMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201427078000000129917000
Thursday, January 1, 201533038000000152898000
Friday, January 1, 201632780000000177792000
Sunday, January 1, 201734261000000212646000
Monday, January 1, 201838353000000259714000
Tuesday, January 1, 201942910000000281596000
Wednesday, January 1, 202046078000000378498000
Friday, January 1, 202152232000000522339000
Saturday, January 1, 202262650000000745596000
Sunday, January 1, 202365863000000799953000
Monday, January 1, 202474114000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, Microsoft Corporation and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft has seen a steady increase, with costs rising by approximately 173%, reflecting its expansive growth and diversification strategies. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. has experienced a more modest increase of around 516%, albeit from a much smaller base, highlighting its niche market focus and efficient scaling.

A Decade of Growth

Microsoft's cost of revenue surged from 27 billion in 2014 to an impressive 74 billion by 2023, underscoring its dominance in the tech industry. Meanwhile, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. saw its costs rise from 130 million to nearly 800 million, marking its emergence as a significant player in power solutions. The data for 2024 remains incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025