| __timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 66755000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 72312000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 83012000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 97257000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 113803000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 133542000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 161670000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 226190000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 273595000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 275740000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial dynamics of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. This steady increase underscores Microsoft's commitment to maintaining its competitive edge in the tech world.
In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, while significantly smaller, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by over 300% from 2014 to 2022. This rapid increase highlights its aggressive expansion strategy in the semiconductor industry.
The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trends thus far paint a vivid picture of two companies navigating their unique paths in the tech ecosystem.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Microsoft Corporation and II-VI Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Microsoft Corporation or Corpay, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or CDW Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation vs GoDaddy Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Microsoft Corporation and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft Corporation Against Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.