Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Bausch Health Companies Inc.

Pharma Giants' Cost of Revenue: A Decade in Review

__timestampBausch Health Companies Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014225460000014400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015264500000033800000
Friday, January 1, 2016261100000035900000
Sunday, January 1, 201725480000001254000
Monday, January 1, 201823510000004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 201923500000007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020224900000010100000
Friday, January 1, 2021239400000014300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022236400000023200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023255900000039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Companies: Cost of Revenue Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the cost dynamics is crucial. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue for two prominent players: Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Over the past decade, Bausch Health has consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, averaging around $2.4 billion annually. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences has shown a more modest average of approximately $18 million, reflecting its different business model and scale.

From 2014 to 2023, Bausch Health's cost of revenue fluctuated slightly, peaking in 2015 and 2023. Meanwhile, Neurocrine Biosciences experienced a significant increase, with a 175% rise from 2014 to 2023. This stark contrast highlights the diverse strategies and market positions of these companies. As the industry continues to grow, monitoring these trends offers valuable insights into their financial health and strategic direction.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025