Cost of Revenue Comparison: Oracle Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation

Oracle vs. Lam: A Decade of Cost Dynamics

__timestampLam Research CorporationOracle Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201425998280007236000000
Thursday, January 1, 201529749760007532000000
Friday, January 1, 201632669710007479000000
Sunday, January 1, 201744102610007452000000
Monday, January 1, 201859119660008060000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201952951000007995000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202054360430007938000000
Friday, January 1, 202178208440007855000000
Saturday, January 1, 202293552320008877000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023965159100013564000000
Monday, January 1, 2024785259500015143000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: Oracle vs. Lam Research

In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding cost structures is crucial. From 2014 to 2024, Oracle Corporation and Lam Research Corporation have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue. Oracle's cost of revenue has consistently been higher, peaking in 2024 with a 68% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Lam Research saw a significant rise, with a 202% increase over the same period, reflecting its expanding operations and market reach.

Key Insights

  • Oracle's Stability: Oracle's cost of revenue remained relatively stable, with a notable jump in 2023, indicating strategic investments or market shifts.
  • Lam's Growth: Lam Research's costs surged, particularly post-2017, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy.

These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the tech sector, where companies must balance growth with cost efficiency to maintain competitive advantage.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025