Oracle Corporation vs Analog Devices, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Oracle vs. Analog Devices: Cost Efficiency Battle Unveiled

__timestampAnalog Devices, Inc.Oracle Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201410345850007236000000
Thursday, January 1, 201511758300007532000000
Friday, January 1, 201611942360007479000000
Sunday, January 1, 201720459070007452000000
Monday, January 1, 201819676400008060000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919773150007995000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019125780007938000000
Friday, January 1, 202127932740007855000000
Saturday, January 1, 202244814790008877000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023442832100013564000000
Monday, January 1, 2024404581400015143000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Oracle vs. Analog Devices: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for corporate success. Over the past decade, Oracle Corporation and Analog Devices, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to managing their cost of revenue. From 2014 to 2024, Oracle's cost of revenue has consistently been higher, peaking at approximately $15 billion in 2024, reflecting its expansive operations. In contrast, Analog Devices, Inc. has shown a more conservative growth, with its cost of revenue reaching around $4 billion in the same year. This disparity highlights Oracle's aggressive market strategies compared to Analog Devices' more measured approach. Notably, both companies experienced significant increases in 2023, with Oracle's costs surging by 53% and Analog Devices by 10%. These trends underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry and the strategic decisions that shape financial outcomes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025