Cost of Revenue Comparison: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Comparing cost trends in finance and cybersecurity sectors.

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141761400000159628000
Thursday, January 1, 20151828200000251499000
Friday, January 1, 20161975900000370000000
Sunday, January 1, 20173109600000476600000
Monday, January 1, 20183169600000645300000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193131900000808400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203265100000999500000
Friday, January 1, 202135708000001274900000
Saturday, January 1, 202241169000001718700000
Sunday, January 1, 202342755000001909700000
Monday, January 1, 202445729000002059199999
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the financial and cybersecurity sectors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue from 2014 to 2024. Broadridge, a stalwart in financial technology, has seen its cost of revenue grow by approximately 160% over the decade, reflecting its expanding operations and market reach. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks, a leader in cybersecurity, has experienced a staggering increase of over 1,200% in the same period, underscoring its rapid growth and the increasing demand for cybersecurity solutions.

While Broadridge's cost of revenue has consistently been higher, Palo Alto Networks' growth rate is a testament to the dynamic nature of the tech industry. As we move forward, these trends highlight the differing challenges and opportunities faced by companies in distinct sectors, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025