Palo Alto Networks, Inc. or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Palo Alto vs. Broadridge

__timestampBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014376000000407912000
Thursday, January 1, 2015396800000624261000
Friday, January 1, 2016420900000914400000
Sunday, January 1, 20175014000001117400000
Monday, January 1, 20185654000001356200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195775000001605800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206390000001819800000
Friday, January 1, 20217443000002144900000
Saturday, January 1, 20228323000002553900000
Sunday, January 1, 20238490000002991700000
Monday, January 1, 20249168000003475000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Palo Alto Networks or Broadridge Financial Solutions?

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Palo Alto Networks has seen a significant increase in SG&A costs, rising from approximately $408 million in 2014 to an estimated $3.475 billion in 2024. This represents an increase of over 750%, reflecting the company's aggressive growth strategy and expansion efforts. In contrast, Broadridge Financial Solutions has managed a more modest increase of about 144% over the same period, from $376 million to $916 million.

This data suggests that while Palo Alto Networks is investing heavily in its operations, Broadridge is maintaining a more controlled approach to its SG&A expenses, potentially indicating a more efficient cost management strategy.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025