| __timestamp | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | Snap-on Incorporated |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 12401436000 | 1693400000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 12259014000 | 1704500000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 11931821000 | 1720800000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 13680857000 | 1862000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 15269479000 | 1870700000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14021726000 | 1886000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 15037716000 | 1844000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21493659000 | 2141200000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 22826428000 | 2311700000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 16457570000 | 2488500000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 16416191000 | 2329500000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of American business, Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. stand as titans in their respective industries. From 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. C.H. Robinson, a leader in logistics, saw its cost of revenue peak in 2022, reaching nearly 83% higher than its 2014 figures. However, 2023 marked a significant decline, dropping by approximately 28% from the previous year. Meanwhile, Snap-on, a stalwart in the tool manufacturing sector, demonstrated a steady climb, with its cost of revenue increasing by about 47% over the same period. This divergence highlights the dynamic nature of operational costs across industries. While C.H. Robinson faced volatility, Snap-on's consistent growth underscores its resilience. Missing data for 2024 suggests a pause, inviting speculation on future trends.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Snap-on Incorporated vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Saia, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Snap-on Incorporated and U-Haul Holding Company
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Snap-on Incorporated and Pool Corporation's Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Snap-on Incorporated and Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Snap-on Incorporated vs Elbit Systems Ltd.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Clean Harbors, Inc.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Snap-on Incorporated vs Nordson Corporation
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Snap-on Incorporated and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Snap-on Incorporated vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison