Cost of Revenue Comparison: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Rentokil Initial plc

Comparing cost strategies of two industry giants over a decade.

__timestampRentokil Initial plcStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142975000007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 20153102000007099800000
Friday, January 1, 20163761000007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 20174749000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 20185142000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 201920990000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202021364000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 2021223910000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022273700000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 202392700000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 202410851300000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of industrial tools and services, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc stand as titans. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2023, these companies have showcased contrasting trajectories in their cost of revenue. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., a leader in the tools industry, consistently reported a cost of revenue that was approximately 10 times higher than Rentokil Initial plc, a global leader in pest control services. Notably, in 2022, Stanley Black & Decker's cost of revenue peaked at over 12 billion, marking a 75% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Rentokil Initial plc saw a significant surge in 2019, with costs rising by over 300% compared to 2014, reflecting strategic expansions. This comparison highlights the diverse financial strategies and market dynamics influencing these industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025