__timestamp | Rentokil Initial plc | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 935700000 | 2595900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 965700000 | 2486400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1197600000 | 2623900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1329600000 | 2980100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1364000000 | 3171700000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 322500000 | 3041000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 352000000 | 3089600000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 348600000 | 3240400000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 479000000 | 3370000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2870000000 | 2829300000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 3310500000 |
Unleashing insights
In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $3.37 billion in 2022. In contrast, Rentokil Initial plc demonstrated a more volatile pattern, with a significant spike in 2023, reaching nearly $2.87 billion, a stark increase from previous years.
While Stanley Black & Decker's expenses grew by about 30% over the period, Rentokil's expenses fluctuated, reflecting strategic shifts. This data highlights the importance of cost management in sustaining competitive advantage. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into effective financial strategies.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Rentokil Initial plc: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs Rentokil Initial plc
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or U-Haul Holding Company: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Nordson Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. vs ITT Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc