Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. or Rentokil Initial plc

SG&A Cost Management: Stanley Black & Decker vs. Rentokil Initial

__timestampRentokil Initial plcStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20149357000002595900000
Thursday, January 1, 20159657000002486400000
Friday, January 1, 201611976000002623900000
Sunday, January 1, 201713296000002980100000
Monday, January 1, 201813640000003171700000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193225000003041000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203520000003089600000
Friday, January 1, 20213486000003240400000
Saturday, January 1, 20224790000003370000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328700000002829300000
Monday, January 1, 20243310500000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Rentokil Initial plc have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Stanley Black & Decker consistently maintained higher SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $3.37 billion in 2022. In contrast, Rentokil Initial plc demonstrated a more volatile pattern, with a significant spike in 2023, reaching nearly $2.87 billion, a stark increase from previous years.

While Stanley Black & Decker's expenses grew by about 30% over the period, Rentokil's expenses fluctuated, reflecting strategic shifts. This data highlights the importance of cost management in sustaining competitive advantage. As businesses navigate economic uncertainties, understanding these trends offers valuable insights into effective financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025