Cost of Revenue Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Verisk Analytics, Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs Verisk: A Decade of Cost Efficiency

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20149209000000716598000
Thursday, January 1, 20158810000000803274000
Friday, January 1, 20168232000000714400000
Sunday, January 1, 20178079000000783800000
Monday, January 1, 20184131000000886200000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192431000000976800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202269000000993900000
Friday, January 1, 202124780000001057800000
Saturday, January 1, 20222408000000824600000
Sunday, January 1, 20234095000000876500000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of financial analytics, the cost of revenue is a critical metric that reflects a company's efficiency in managing its production expenses. Over the past decade, Thomson Reuters Corporation and Verisk Analytics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trajectories in this regard.

From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters experienced a significant reduction in its cost of revenue, plummeting by over 55%, from a peak in 2014 to a low in 2020. This decline highlights the company's strategic shift towards more cost-effective operations. In contrast, Verisk Analytics maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, with a modest increase of about 20% over the same period. This stability underscores Verisk's consistent approach to managing its operational costs.

These trends offer a fascinating glimpse into how two industry leaders navigate the complexities of financial management, each with its unique strategy and focus.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025