Cost of Revenue Comparison: Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs Ferrovial SE

Comparing cost efficiency of Verisk vs Ferrovial over a decade.

__timestampFerrovial SEVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141131000000716598000
Thursday, January 1, 20151143000000803274000
Friday, January 1, 20161267000000714400000
Sunday, January 1, 20171345000000783800000
Monday, January 1, 2018985000000886200000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019949000000976800000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201005000000993900000
Friday, January 1, 202110770000001057800000
Saturday, January 1, 20221197000000824600000
Sunday, January 1, 20231129000000876500000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency. This chart offers a fascinating comparison between Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Ferrovial SE from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Ferrovial SE consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2017 with a 19% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Verisk Analytics, Inc. showed a steady upward trend, reaching its zenith in 2021 with a 48% rise from its 2014 figures.

Key Insights

  • Ferrovial SE: Despite fluctuations, the company managed to reduce its cost of revenue by 16% from 2017 to 2019, showcasing strategic cost management.
  • Verisk Analytics, Inc.: Demonstrated resilience with a 48% increase in cost of revenue from 2014 to 2021, reflecting its growth and expansion strategies.

This analysis provides a window into the financial strategies of these industry leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025