__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Verisk Analytics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 716598000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 803274000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 714400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 783800000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 886200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 976800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 993900000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 1057800000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 824600000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 876500000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's efficiency. This chart offers a fascinating comparison between Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Ferrovial SE from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Ferrovial SE consistently maintained a higher cost of revenue, peaking in 2017 with a 19% increase from 2014. Meanwhile, Verisk Analytics, Inc. showed a steady upward trend, reaching its zenith in 2021 with a 48% rise from its 2014 figures.
This analysis provides a window into the financial strategies of these industry leaders, offering valuable insights for investors and analysts alike.
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs Ferguson plc
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Verisk Analytics, Inc. and United Airlines Holdings, Inc.'s Expenses
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Xylem Inc.'s Expenses
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs HEICO Corporation
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Ferrovial SE
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Global Payments Inc.'s Expenses
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs Dover Corporation
Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs Ferrovial SE: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison