Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Verisk Analytics, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

Comparative Cost Analysis: Verisk vs. Westinghouse (2014-2023)

__timestampVerisk Analytics, Inc.Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20147165980002130920000
Thursday, January 1, 20158032740002281845000
Friday, January 1, 20167144000002029647000
Sunday, January 1, 20177838000002841159000
Monday, January 1, 20188862000003151816000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199768000006122400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209939000005657400000
Friday, January 1, 202110578000005687000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228246000006070000000
Sunday, January 1, 20238765000006733000000
Monday, January 1, 20247021000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of the U.S. stock market, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for investors and analysts alike. This metric, which represents the direct costs attributable to the production of goods sold by a company, offers insights into operational efficiency and profitability.

Verisk Analytics, Inc. vs. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

From 2014 to 2023, Verisk Analytics, Inc. demonstrated a relatively stable cost of revenue, averaging around $863 million annually. Notably, their cost peaked in 2021, reaching approximately $1.06 billion, a 48% increase from 2014. In contrast, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation experienced a more dynamic trend, with costs surging by over 216% from 2014 to 2023, peaking at $6.73 billion. This stark difference highlights varying operational strategies and market conditions faced by these companies.

Key Takeaways

While Verisk maintains steady growth, Westinghouse's fluctuating costs suggest a more volatile market presence, offering unique investment insights.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025