Cost of Revenue Comparison: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. vs Pool Corporation

ZTO vs. Pool: A Decade of Revenue Growth

__timestampPool CorporationZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201416032220002770530000
Thursday, January 1, 201516874950003998737000
Friday, January 1, 201618297160006345899000
Sunday, January 1, 201719828990008714489000
Monday, January 1, 2018212792400012239568000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019227459200015488778000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020280572100019377184000
Friday, January 1, 2021367849200023816462000
Saturday, January 1, 2022424631500026337721000
Sunday, January 1, 2023388155100026756389000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the dynamic world of logistics and distribution, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. and Pool Corporation stand as giants, each with a unique trajectory. Over the past decade, ZTO Express has seen its cost of revenue skyrocket by nearly 866%, reflecting its aggressive expansion in the booming Chinese logistics market. In contrast, Pool Corporation, a leader in the pool supply industry, has experienced a more modest growth of approximately 142% in its cost of revenue, indicative of steady demand in the North American market.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, ZTO Express's cost of revenue surged from $2.8 billion to $26.8 billion, while Pool Corporation's increased from $1.6 billion to $3.9 billion. This stark contrast highlights the differing scales and growth strategies of these two industry leaders. As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the evolving landscapes of logistics and distribution.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025