__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5229000000 | 3050000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 5707000000 | 2976000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 6314000000 | 3169000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 8005000000 | 3356000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 9436000000 | 3863000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 8222000000 | 3956000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 9510000000 | 3806000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12149000000 | 4131000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13792000000 | 4883000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14133000000 | 5008000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14279000000 | 5305000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a remarkable 173% increase in its cost of revenue, starting from $5.2 billion in 2014 to an impressive $14.3 billion in 2024. This growth reflects the company's expanding operations and market influence. In contrast, Motorola Solutions, Inc. has experienced a more modest 64% rise, from $3.05 billion in 2014 to $5.01 billion in 2023, indicating steady but less aggressive growth.
The data highlights a significant upward trend for both companies, with Applied Materials consistently outpacing Motorola Solutions. However, the absence of data for Motorola Solutions in 2024 suggests potential challenges or strategic shifts. These insights provide a window into the financial strategies and market dynamics of these industry giants.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated's Expenses
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Revenue Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc.'s Expenses
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Atlassian Corporation
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Workday, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. Trends
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.