Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Comparing Cost of Revenue Growth: AMAT vs. MSI

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201452290000003050000000
Thursday, January 1, 201557070000002976000000
Friday, January 1, 201663140000003169000000
Sunday, January 1, 201780050000003356000000
Monday, January 1, 201894360000003863000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201982220000003956000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202095100000003806000000
Friday, January 1, 2021121490000004131000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022137920000004883000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023141330000005008000000
Monday, January 1, 2024142790000005305000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs. Motorola Solutions, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a remarkable 173% increase in its cost of revenue, starting from $5.2 billion in 2014 to an impressive $14.3 billion in 2024. This growth reflects the company's expanding operations and market influence. In contrast, Motorola Solutions, Inc. has experienced a more modest 64% rise, from $3.05 billion in 2014 to $5.01 billion in 2023, indicating steady but less aggressive growth.

The data highlights a significant upward trend for both companies, with Applied Materials consistently outpacing Motorola Solutions. However, the absence of data for Motorola Solutions in 2024 suggests potential challenges or strategic shifts. These insights provide a window into the financial strategies and market dynamics of these industry giants.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025