__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 1184000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1021000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 1000000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 979000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1254000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1403000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1293000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1353000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1450000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 1561000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1752000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. have showcased distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a remarkable 102% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at $1.8 billion in 2023. This growth reflects their strategic investments in innovation and market expansion. Meanwhile, Motorola Solutions experienced a steadier rise, with a 32% increase, reaching $1.56 billion in 2023. Notably, 2024 data for Motorola is missing, leaving room for speculation on their future trajectory. This comparison highlights the dynamic strategies of these tech giants, offering insights into their operational priorities and market positioning. As the tech industry continues to evolve, understanding these financial trends is crucial for investors and analysts alike.
Revenue Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Applied Materials, Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Dell Technologies Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fortinet, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Atlassian Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Workday, Inc. Trends and Insights
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.