Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for ASML Holding N.V. and Teradyne, Inc.

ASML vs. Teradyne: Cost of Revenue Trends Unveiled

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143358907000769016000
Thursday, January 1, 20153391700000723935000
Friday, January 1, 20163750300000793683000
Sunday, January 1, 20174976100000912734000
Monday, January 1, 20186225700000880408000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196919900000955136000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071813000001335728000
Friday, January 1, 202188020000001496225000
Saturday, January 1, 2022106607000001287894000
Sunday, January 1, 2023134224000001139550000
Monday, January 1, 2024137709000001170953000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis of ASML Holding N.V. and Teradyne, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of the semiconductor industry, understanding the cost dynamics is crucial. ASML Holding N.V. and Teradyne, Inc., two giants in this field, have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's cost of revenue surged by approximately 300%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and innovation strategies. In contrast, Teradyne's cost of revenue increased by about 48%, indicating a more stable growth trajectory.

ASML's cost of revenue peaked in 2023, reaching nearly four times its 2014 value, while Teradyne's costs showed a more modest rise, peaking in 2021. These trends highlight ASML's significant investment in cutting-edge technology, positioning it as a leader in the semiconductor equipment market. Meanwhile, Teradyne's steady growth underscores its focus on efficiency and consistent performance.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025