ASML Holding N.V. and Teradyne, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Tech Giants' SG&A Spending: ASML vs. Teradyne

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000306313000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000348287000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000464769000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000571426000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. ASML Holding N.V. and Teradyne, Inc., two titans in the semiconductor and automation sectors, have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, ASML's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 250%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. In contrast, Teradyne's expenses grew by about 80%, indicating a more conservative approach. Notably, ASML's spending in 2023 was nearly double that of Teradyne, highlighting its commitment to maintaining a competitive edge. This divergence in financial strategy underscores the varied paths companies take to achieve growth and market dominance. As the tech industry continues to advance, these spending patterns offer valuable insights into the priorities and future directions of these influential companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025